Questions.

We question and think, but do we always receive the answer which is satisfying to our curiosity or does it really fulfill the purpose of the subject that matters? I questioned why there are creatures who love heading down to the clubs so often, people questioned my agenda of abusing alcohol and cigarettes. A lot of times we judge someone’s deed long before the answer surfaces even when it’s coming our way. By right, I don’t think what is right or wrong should be determined by the society or even God himself. Society is a system where weaklings abide and go with the motion of what the majority is doing, in fact someone conceives an idea which people think is most comfortable to them, it will then be the rule, the law. Back in the ancient days, someone jackass said that murder is bad and whoever does that should be punished, well, people that time agreed and we still do now. I think, WHAT IF it was somebody who thought the opposite and was much persuasive in infusing the thought of murder is right, wouldn’t massacre be legal now? It is always about somebody who says something and the rest obeying. For example, the ‘book’ that’s most read and published on earth today, words and values derived from it were what practiced thousands of years ago. I have to agree that it was right back then but one vital thing we men always forget, things change overtime and in suppression of circumstances we behave in few specific manners. Hence, what could be right in the past can be wrong now, what could be wrong can be right.

Few of my friends strongly believe that I’m a sadist, I find pleasure in pain. To top that, I agree to the idea of Euthanasia, to be more precise – mercy killing. Religious groups deem that nobody have the right to take someone’s life, I figured that’s total bullshit and the sentence is not fully finished to deliver the rational sense. “Nobody should have the right to take [or preserve] someone’s life” would prove me some logic. Leading on to destruction, why can’t it be considered as a creation as it shares the same process to achieve creation? Both require planning and progress in order to make either works. We believe creation is for the good and destruction is for the bad, then who defines what’s good and bad at the first place? Society? Individuals?

How would one be perceived if he puts a bullet in a man who was going around killing innocent people in the mall?

How would one be viewed for blind killing? When the belief of demolishing mankind will do greater good to nature as we are parasites on this living rock, in which I agree.

What’s good and bad then?

End.